↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Glanzmann's thrombasthenia: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and current and emerging treatment options

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Glanzmann's thrombasthenia: pathogenesis, diagnosis, and current and emerging treatment options
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s71319
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tia Solh, Ashley Botsford, Melhem Solh

Abstract

Glanzmann's thrombasthenia (GT) is a genetic platelet surface receptor disorder of GPIIb/IIIa (ITG αIIbβ3), either qualitative or quantitative, which results in faulty platelet aggregation and diminished clot retraction. Spontaneous mucocutaneous bleeding is common and can lead to fatal bleeding episodes. Control and prevention of bleeding among patients with GT is imperative, and remains challenging. Local measures, including anti-fibrinolytic therapy, with or without platelet transfusions, used to be the mainstay of therapy. However, in recent years the use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) has increased significantly, with excellent response rates in treating and preventing hemorrhage among GT patients. Gene therapy and stem cell transplantation offer a potential cure of this disease, but both are costly and remain experimental at this point. This manuscript offers a comprehensive review of our understanding of GT and the available treatment options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 40 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 36 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 43 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,505,970
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#71
of 318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,300
of 277,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them