↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens isolated from febrile neutropenic cancer patients with bloodstream infections in Egypt and new synergistic antibiotic combinations

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens isolated from febrile neutropenic cancer patients with bloodstream infections in Egypt and new synergistic antibiotic combinations
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/idr.s163293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sally Tohamy Tohamy, Khaled Mohamed Aboshanab, Hadir Ahmed El-Mahallawy, Mona R El-Ansary, Salwa Selim Afifi

Abstract

Bloodstream infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) are among the most frequent complications in immunocompromised cancer patients because of their considerable morbidity and mortality. Several guidelines on antimicrobial therapy have addressed empirical treatment for such serious infections; however, the emergence of microbial resistance has become a significant problem worldwide. In this study, starting from November 2015 to October 2016, a total of 529 blood specimens were collected from febrile neutropenic cancer patients at a tertiary care cancer hospital in Egypt. On examination for positive bacterial growth, it was found that 334 specimens showed no growth, while 195 were positive. Out of the 195 positive culture specimens, 102 (102/195, 52.3%) were Gram-negative and 93 (93/195, 47.7%) were Gram-positive. Out of the 102 GNB, 70 (70/102, 68.6%) were MDR, including Escherichia coli (27/70, 38.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (24/70, 34.3%), Acinetobacter baumannii (9/70, 12.8%), Enterobacter cloacae (4/70, 5.7%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (2/70, 2.8%), Klebsiella oxytoca (2/70, 2.8%), and Klebsiella ornithinolytica (2/70, 2.8%). All MDR GNB showed high resistance to ampicillin, cefepime, ceftriaxone, and cephradine (minimum inhibitory concentration at which 50% of the isolates were inhibited [MIC50] >512 μg/mL for each). However, they showed good susceptibility to colistin (MIC50 <1 μg/mL). The most common extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs) genes detected were ctx-m (39/70, 55.7%), shv (31/70, 44.3%), and tem (22/70, 31.4%). The most common aminoglycoside-resistant gene detected was aac(6')-Ib (42/70, 60%) followed by the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants; qnrA (2/70, 2.8%), qnrB (9/70, 12.8%), and qnrS (19/70, 27.1%). ESBL determinants were significantly associated with resistance to ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, amikacin, and carbapenems (P-value <0.005). The fractional inhibitory concentration index for ampicillin/sulbactam plus ceftriaxone, ampicillin/sulbactam plus amikacin, and amikacin plus levofloxacin showed synergism against 29 (29/70, 41.4%), 19 (19/70, 27.1%), and 11 (11/70, 15.7%) isolates of the tested MDR GNB isolates, respectively. Accordingly, new empirical antibiotics should be administered including the use of colistin or meropenem alone or both against the MDR GNB in neutropenic cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 4%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 31 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 12 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 35 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#14,121,673
of 23,073,835 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#485
of 1,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,640
of 326,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,073,835 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,693 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.