↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Facilitating the implementation of evidence-based practice through contextual support and nursing leadership

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Healthcare Leadership, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Facilitating the implementation of evidence-based practice through contextual support and nursing leadership
Published in
Journal of Healthcare Leadership, June 2015
DOI 10.2147/jhl.s45077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Angela Kueny, Leah L Shever, Melissa Lehan Mackin, Marita G Titler

Abstract

Nurse managers (NMs) play an important role promoting evidence-based practice (EBP) on clinical units within hospitals. However, there is a dearth of research focused on NM perspectives about institutional contextual factors to support the goal of EBP on the clinical unit. The purpose of this article is to identify contextual factors described by NMs to drive change and facilitate EBP at the unit level, comparing and contrasting these perspectives across nursing units. This study employed a qualitative descriptive design using interviews with nine NMs who were participating in a large effectiveness study. To stratify the sample, NMs were selected from nursing units designated as high or low performing based on implementation of EBP interventions, scores on the Meyer and Goes research use scale, and fall rates. Descriptive content analysis was used to identify themes that reflect the complex nature of infrastructure described by NMs and contextual influences that supported or hindered their promotion of EBP on the clinical unit. NMs perceived workplace culture, structure, and resources as facilitators or barriers to empowering nurses under their supervision to use EBP and drive change. A workplace culture that provides clear communication of EBP goals or regulatory changes, direct contact with CEOs, and clear expectations supported NMs in their promotion of EBP on their units. High-performing unit NMs described a structure that included nursing-specific committees, allowing nurses to drive change and EBP from within the unit. NMs from high-performing units were more likely to articulate internal resources, such as quality-monitoring departments, as critical to the implementation of EBP on their units. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of institutional contextual factors that can be used to support NMs in their efforts to drive EBP changes at the unit level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 152 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 19%
Student > Bachelor 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 12%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 42 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 70 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 42 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2015.
All research outputs
#18,890,560
of 23,406,603 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#194,718
of 268,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,406,603 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them