↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A polypropylene mesh modified with poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibers in hernia repair: large animal experiment

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
A polypropylene mesh modified with poly-ε-caprolactone nanofibers in hernia repair: large animal experiment
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s159480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barbora East, Martin Plencner, Martin Kralovic, Michala Rampichova, Vera Sovkova, Karolina Vocetkova, Martin Otahal, Zbynek Tonar, Yaroslav Kolinko, Evzen Amler, Jiri Hoch

Abstract

Incisional hernia repair is an unsuccessful field of surgery, with long-term recurrence rates reaching up to 50% regardless of technique or mesh material used. Various implants and their positioning within the abdominal wall pose numerous long-term complications that are difficult to treat due to their permanent nature and the chronic foreign body reaction they trigger. Materials mimicking the 3D structure of the extracellular matrix promote cell adhesion, proliferation, migration, and differentiation. Some electrospun nanofibrous scaffolds provide a topography of a natural extracellular matrix and are cost effective to manufacture. A composite scaffold that was assembled out of a standard polypropylene hernia mesh and poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL) nanofibers was tested in a large animal model (minipig), and the final scar tissue was subjected to histological and biomechanical testing to verify our in vitro results published previously. We have demonstrated that a layer of PCL nanofibers leads to tissue overgrowth and the formation of a thick fibrous plate around the implant. Collagen maturation is accelerated, and the final scar is more flexible and elastic than under a standard polypropylene mesh with less pronounced shrinkage observed. However, the samples with the composite scaffold were less resistant to distracting forces than when a standard mesh was used. We believe that the adverse effects could be caused due to the material assembly, as they do not comply with our previous results. We believe that PCL nanofibers on their own can cause enough fibroplasia to be used as a separate material without the polypropylene base, thus avoiding potential adverse effects caused by any added substances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 4 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 8%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 17 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 17%
Engineering 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Materials Science 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 21 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,886
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,228
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#41
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.