| Title |
Solid dispersions in the form of electrospun core-sheath nanofibers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s27468 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deng-Guang Yu, Li-Min Zhu, Christopher J Branford-White, Jun-He Yang, Xia Wang, Ying Li, Wei Qian |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 85 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 33% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 15 | 18% |
| Unknown | 17 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 12 | 14% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
| Chemical Engineering | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,798,611
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#264
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,194
of 246,216 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#5
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,216 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.