↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Preeclampsia: long-term consequences for vascular health

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
151 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
250 Mendeley
Title
Preeclampsia: long-term consequences for vascular health
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s64798
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorena M Amaral, Mark W Cunningham, Denise C Cornelius, Babbette LaMarca

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy-specific syndrome and one of the leading causes of preterm birth, neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. This disease is characterized by new onset hypertension usually in the third trimester of pregnancy and is sometimes associated with proteinuria, although proteinuria is not a requirement for the diagnosis of PE. In developing countries, women have a higher risk of death due to PE than more affluent countries and one of the most frequent causes of death is high blood pressure and stroke. Although PE only affects approximately 2%-8% of pregnancies worldwide it is associated with severe complications such as eclampsia, hemorrhagic stroke, hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets (HELLP syndrome), renal failure and pulmonary edema. Importantly, there is no "cure" for the disease except for early delivery of the baby and placenta, leaving PE a health care risk for babies born from PE moms. In addition, PE is linked to the development of cardiovascular disease and stroke in women after reproductive age, leaving PE a risk factor for long-term health in women. This review will highlight factors implicated in the pathophysiology of PE that may contribute to long-term effects in women with preeclamptic pregnancies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 250 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 250 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 59 24%
Student > Master 29 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 10%
Student > Postgraduate 21 8%
Researcher 20 8%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 50 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 13 5%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 63 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#6,561,838
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#211
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,581
of 277,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.