The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Title |
Fluticasone furoate nasal spray in the treatment of allergic rhinitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, April 2008
|
DOI | 10.2147/tcrm.s1984 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pedro Giavina-Bianchi, Rosana Agondi, Rafael Stelmach, Alberto Cukier, Jorge Kalil |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Russia | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 11 | 17% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
Student > Master | 8 | 12% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 14 | 22% |
Unknown | 11 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 40% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 12% |
Chemistry | 5 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 13 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#275
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,650
of 95,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,970 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.