Title |
Orengedoku-to augmentation in cases showing partial response to yokukan-san treatment: a case report and literature review of the evidence for use of these Kampo herbal formulae
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s38318 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hideki Okamoto, Atsushi Chino, Yoshiro Hirasaki, Keigo Ueda, Masaomi Iyo, Takao Namiki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 37 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
Librarian | 2 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 32% |
Unknown | 6 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
Psychology | 8 | 21% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,152
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,366
of 289,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#14
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.