↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Bacteriophage-based therapy in cystic fibrosis-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: rationale and current status

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
Title
Bacteriophage-based therapy in cystic fibrosis-associated Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: rationale and current status
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s53123
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sami Hraiech, Fabienne Brégeon, Jean-Marc Rolain

Abstract

Pulmonary infections involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa are among the leading causes of the deterioration of the respiratory status of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains in such populations, favored by iterative antibiotic cures, has led to the urgent need for new therapies. Among them, bacteriophage-based therapies deserve a focus. One century of empiric use in the ex-USSR countries suggests that bacteriophages may have beneficial effects against a large range of bacterial infections. Interest in bacteriophages has recently renewed in Western countries, and the in vitro data available suggest that bacteriophage-based therapy may be of significant interest for the treatment of pulmonary infections in CF patients. Although the clinical data concerning this specific population are relatively scarce, the beginning of the first large randomized study evaluating bacteriophage-based therapy in burn infections suggests that the time has come to assess the effectiveness of this new therapy in CF P. aeruginosa pneumonia. Consequently, the aim of this review is, after a brief history, to summarize the evidence concerning bacteriophage efficacy against P. aeruginosa and, more specifically, the in vitro studies, animal models, and clinical trials targeting CF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 19%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 10%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 56 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,175,981
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#53
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,143
of 277,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#2
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.