↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Role of apolipoprotein E in neurodegenerative diseases

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
132 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
340 Mendeley
Title
Role of apolipoprotein E in neurodegenerative diseases
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s84266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vo Van Giau, Eva Bagyinszky, Seong Soo A An, Sang Yun Kim

Abstract

Apolipoprotein E (APOE) is a lipid-transport protein abundantly expressed in most neurons in the central nervous system. APOE-dependent alterations of the endocytic pathway can affect different functions. APOE binds to cell-surface receptors to deliver lipids and to the hydrophobic amyloid-β peptide, regulating amyloid-β aggregations and clearances in the brain. Several APOE isoforms with major structural differences were discovered and shown to influence the brain lipid transport, glucose metabolism, neuronal signaling, neuroinflammation, and mitochondrial function. This review will summarize the updated research progress on APOE functions and its role in Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, cardiovascular diseases, multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Type III hyperlipoproteinemia, vascular dementia, and ischemic stroke. Understanding the mutations in APOE, their structural properties, and their isoforms is important to determine its role in various diseases and to advance the development of therapeutic strategies. Targeting APOE may be a potential approach for diagnosis, risk assessment, prevention, and treatment of various neurodegenerative and cardiovascular diseases in humans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 340 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 334 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 17%
Student > Master 55 16%
Student > Bachelor 44 13%
Researcher 40 12%
Other 18 5%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 77 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 47 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 45 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 19 6%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 94 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,751,586
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#356
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,585
of 277,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#10
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.