↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Vitamin K antagonist use and renal function in pre-dialysis patients

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Vitamin K antagonist use and renal function in pre-dialysis patients
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/clep.s154719
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pauline WM Voskamp, Friedo W Dekker, Maarten B Rookmaaker, Marianne C Verhaar, Willem Jan W Bos, Merel van Diepen, Gurbey Ocak

Abstract

A post hoc analysis of a recent trial on direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists showed that amongst patients with mildly decreased kidney function, use of vitamin K antagonists was associated with a greater decline in renal function than use of direct oral anticoagulants. Whether these vitamin K antagonist effects are the same in pre-dialysis patients is unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the association between vitamin K antagonist use and the rate of renal function decline and time until start of dialysis in incident pre-dialysis patients. Data from 984 patients from the PREdialysis PAtient REcord study, a multicenter follow-up study of patients with chronic kidney disease who started pre-dialysis care in the Netherlands (1999-2011), were analyzed. Of these patients, 101 used a vitamin K antagonist. Linear mixed models were used to compare renal function decline between vitamin K antagonist users and non-users. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the HR with 95% CI for starting dialysis. Vitamin K antagonist use was associated with an extra change in renal function of -0.09 (95% CI -1.32 to 1.13) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year after adjustment for confounding. The adjusted HR for the start of dialysis was 1.20 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.69) in vitamin K antagonist users, compared to non-users. In incident pre-dialysis patients, the use of vitamin K antagonists was not associated with an accelerated kidney function decline or an earlier start of dialysis compared to non-use. The lack of knowledge on the indication for vitamin K antagonist use could lead to confounding by indication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 6 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Psychology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,831,133
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#266
of 728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,983
of 326,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#13
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.