↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

HIV-associated nephropathy: links, risks and management

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 331)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
Title
HIV-associated nephropathy: links, risks and management
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), May 2018
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s141978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura Palau, Steven Menez, Javier Rodriguez-Sanchez, Tessa Novick, Marco Delsante, Blaithin A McMahon, Mohamed G Atta

Abstract

Despite the decreased incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-associated nephropathy due to the widespread use of combined active antiretroviral therapy, it remains one of the leading causes of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in HIV-1 seropositive patients. Patients usually present with low CD4 count, high viral load and heavy proteinuria, with the pathologic findings of collapsing focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Increased susceptibility exists in individuals with African descent, largely due to polymorphism in APOL1 gene. Other clinical risk factors include high viral load and low CD4 count. Advanced kidney disease and nephrotic range proteinuria have been associated with progression to ESRD. Improvement in kidney function has been observed after initiation of combined active antiretroviral therapy. Other treatment options, when clinically indicated, are inhibition of the renin-angiotensin system and corticosteroids. Further routine management approaches for patients with chronic kidney disease should be implemented. In patients with progression to ESRD, kidney transplant should be pursued, provided that viral load control is adequate. Screening for the presence of kidney disease upon detection of HIV-1 seropositivity in high-risk populations is recommended.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 77 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 16%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 6 8%
Researcher 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 30 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 30 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2023.
All research outputs
#3,623,941
of 25,540,105 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#28
of 331 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,013
of 339,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,540,105 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 331 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,613 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.