↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Orphan drugs in glioblastoma multiforme: a review

Overview of attention for article published in Orphan Drugs: Research and Reviews, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Orphan drugs in glioblastoma multiforme: a review
Published in
Orphan Drugs: Research and Reviews, November 2014
DOI 10.2147/odrr.s46018
Authors

Ulrik Lassen, Morten Mau-Soerensen, Hans Skovgaard Poulsen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 11 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2020.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Orphan Drugs: Research and Reviews
#6
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,775
of 273,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphan Drugs: Research and Reviews
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them