↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Prevalence of bone metastases and bone-targeting agent use among solid tumor patients in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence of bone metastases and bone-targeting agent use among solid tumor patients in the United States
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/clep.s85496
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rohini K Hernandez, Avanti Adhia, Sally W Wade, Emily O’Connor, Jorge Arellano, Kevin Francis, Hasmik Alvrtsyan, Ryan P Million, Alexander Liede

Abstract

Patients with bone metastases are at an increased risk of experiencing morbidity due to bone complications, and bone-targeting agents (BTA) are indicated for the prevention of these complications. Population-based estimates of the prevalence of bone metastases associated with solid tumors, and current treatment patterns for these patients, are limited. This study was undertaken to estimate the prevalence of bone metastases from solid tumors and to describe recent trends in the use of BTA in the US. We estimated the prevalence of bone metastases in the US in 2012 using data from Medicare fee-for-service and PharMetrics Plus, a large commercial claims database. We evaluated the proportion of patients with bone metastases who were treated with BTA in 2012, timing of initiation of BTA relative to bone metastasis diagnosis, and persistence on BTA, overall and by primary tumor type and treatment. There were ~330,000 (168,063 Medicare fee-for-service; 162,239 other) patients aged ≥18 years living with solid tumors and bone metastases in 2012. BTA were used by 43% (Commercial) to 47% (Medicare) of patients in 2012, with the greatest use among breast cancer patients. Over half (Medicare: 57%; Commercial: 53%) of BTA-treated patients initiated BTA after experiencing a bone complication. Of the estimated 330,000 solid tumor patients living with bone metastases in the US in 2012, many may have received less than optimal care to prevent bone complications during the calendar year.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Other 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 31%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 20 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2015.
All research outputs
#16,047,334
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#470
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,207
of 277,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.