↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Pharmacist interventions for obesity: improving treatment adherence and patient outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacist interventions for obesity: improving treatment adherence and patient outcomes
Published in
Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/iprp.s72206
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie A Jordan, Jonathan Harmon

Abstract

Obesity is currently a worldwide pandemic, with overweight (body mass index [BMI] ≥25 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) estimated at 35% and 12% of the global adult population, respectively. According to data collected from the United States National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, approximately 68.8% of US adults are overweight or obese. Additionally, a large burden of health care costs can be attributed directly to obesity as well as multiple, potentially preventable, comorbidities such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes. As a result, national and international organizations, such as the US Centers for Disease Control and World Health Organization, have made halting the rise of the obesity epidemic a top priority. Pharmacists, commonly considered one of the most trustworthy and accessible health care professionals, are ideally situated to provide counseling for weight and lifestyle management. This review presents examples of pharmacist-led as well as collaborative practices that have been somewhat successful in educating and monitoring patient progress in attaining weight-loss goals. Common barriers and potential solutions to administration of lifestyle counseling and monitoring programs, such as limited pharmacist time and resources, lack of expertise and/or confidence in program administration, and patient perception and awareness, are also discussed.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 76 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Lecturer 4 5%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 36 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 24 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 39 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2018.
All research outputs
#18,418,919
of 22,817,213 outputs
Outputs from Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
#83
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,228
of 263,426 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Integrated Pharmacy Research and Practice
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,817,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,426 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.