Title |
Self-microemulsifying drug-delivery system for improved oral bioavailability of probucol: preparation and evaluation
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, February 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s28052 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaoling Fang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 40 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 24% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 24% |
Researcher | 4 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 20% |
Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 29% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 17% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 17% |
Chemistry | 4 | 10% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Unknown | 8 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,568,674
of 23,083,773 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#940
of 3,848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,583
of 248,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#30
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,083,773 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,848 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.