↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Quantum dots in imaging, drug delivery and sensor applications

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#39 of 4,130)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
497 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
694 Mendeley
Title
Quantum dots in imaging, drug delivery and sensor applications
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2017
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s138624
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cristian T Matea, Teodora Mocan, Flaviu Tabaran, Teodora Pop, Ofelia Mosteanu, Cosmin Puia, Cornel Iancu, Lucian Mocan

Abstract

Quantum dots (QDs), also known as nanoscale semiconductor crystals, are nanoparticles with unique optical and electronic properties such as bright and intensive fluorescence. Since most conventional organic label dyes do not offer the near-infrared (>650 nm) emission possibility, QDs, with their tunable optical properties, have gained a lot of interest. They possess characteristics such as good chemical and photo-stability, high quantum yield and size-tunable light emission. Different types of QDs can be excited with the same light wavelength, and their narrow emission bands can be detected simultaneously for multiple assays. There is an increasing interest in the development of nano-theranostics platforms for simultaneous sensing, imaging and therapy. QDs have great potential for such applications, with notable results already published in the fields of sensors, drug delivery and biomedical imaging. This review summarizes the latest developments available in literature regarding the use of QDs for medical applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 694 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 694 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 105 15%
Student > Bachelor 93 13%
Student > Master 90 13%
Researcher 58 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 4%
Other 74 11%
Unknown 246 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 83 12%
Chemistry 81 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 63 9%
Engineering 45 6%
Materials Science 31 4%
Other 102 15%
Unknown 289 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,222,007
of 25,470,300 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#39
of 4,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,193
of 327,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,470,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,130 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.