↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Socioeconomic inequality in the use of prescription medications for smoking cessation among patients with COPD: a nationwide study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Socioeconomic inequality in the use of prescription medications for smoking cessation among patients with COPD: a nationwide study
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s158954
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Søgaard Tøttenborg, Alice Jessie Clark, Reimar Wernich Thomsen, Søren Paaske Johnsen, Peter Lange

Abstract

Bupropion and varenicline can substantially improve the chances of smoking cessation in patients with COPD, but are unsubsidized and relatively costly. We examined overall use and socioeconomic patterns of use among patients with COPD. We identified 4,741 COPD patients reporting to be smokers at their first contact for COPD during 2008-2012 in the Danish register of COPD, which covers all pulmonary outpatient clinics in Denmark. Patients were followed for 6 months in the National Prescription Registry. Logistic regression analyses were used to calculate the ORs with corresponding 95% CI of redeeming a prescription for any of the smoking cessation medications in strata of baseline characteristics. During 6 months from first consultation, only 5% redeemed a prescription for bupropion or varenicline. Younger age, female sex, higher education, and higher income were associated with an increased likelihood, while non-Danish ethnicity, living alone, and very severe COPD were associated with a lower likelihood of redeeming bupropion or varenicline. Despite their proven effectiveness, bupropion and varenicline are sparingly used among COPD patients followed in the hospital outpatient setting with the lowest use among the socioeconomically disadvantaged. This highlights a missed opportunity for intervention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 2 9%
Librarian 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,656,981
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#277
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,643
of 339,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#10
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.