↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Brachytherapy for patients with uveal melanoma: historical perspectives and future treatment directions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Brachytherapy for patients with uveal melanoma: historical perspectives and future treatment directions
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/opth.s129645
Pubmed ID
Authors

Beatrice Y Brewington, Yusra F Shao, Frederick H Davidorf, Colleen M Cebulla

Abstract

Surgical management with enucleation was the primary treatment for uveal melanoma (UM) for over 100 years. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study confirmed in 2001 that globe-preserving episcleral brachytherapy for UM was safe and effective, demonstrating no survival difference with enucleation. Today, brachytherapy is the most common form of radiotherapy for UM. We review the history of brachytherapy in the treatment of UM and the evolution of the procedure to incorporate fine-needle-aspiration biopsy techniques with DNA-and RNA-based genetic prognostic testing.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 23%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Unspecified 2 15%
Physics and Astronomy 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Neuroscience 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2018.
All research outputs
#8,313,033
of 13,801,769 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#799
of 1,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,813
of 275,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#11
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,801,769 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,851 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.