↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Drug utilization in selected health facilities of South West Shoa Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 160)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Drug utilization in selected health facilities of South West Shoa Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia
Published in
Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/dhps.s84890
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mengistu Kebede, Dereje Kebebe Borga, Eshetu Mulisa Bobasa

Abstract

Sustaining the availability and rational use of safe and effective drugs is a major problem in developing countries. Irrational drug use affects quality of health care more than accessibility of drugs. To assess drug utilization in selected health facilities of South West Shoa Zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted in selected health facilities of South West Shoa Zone from January 21-28, 2012 by using structured questionnaires. Of 50 prescribers and 30 dispensers, 58% and 83.3% were males, respectively. The result showed that majority of prescribers agreed on availability of essential drugs (72%) and had access to up-to-date drug information (76%). However, 43.3% of dispensers didn't get access to up-to-date drug information. 86% and 88% of prescribers note cost of drugs and stick to standard treatment guidelines of Ethiopia during prescription, respectively. All drug dispensers check the name of the drug (100%), age of the patient (90%), the dosage form of drug (96.7%), the route of administration (90%), the duration of therapy (86.7%), and frequency of administration (86.7%) for prescription papers. In general, drug utilization at the study sites was found to be good, although there are major deviations from the concept of rational drug use.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Lecturer 6 19%
Researcher 5 16%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 13%
Unspecified 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 5 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,577,420
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
#27
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,557
of 277,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug, Healthcare and Patient Safety
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them