Title |
Cytoskeleton, cytoskeletal interactions, and vascular endothelial function
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cell health and cytoskeleton, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.2147/chc.s21823 |
Authors |
Michael Widlansky, Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 29% |
Professor | 1 | 14% |
Researcher | 1 | 14% |
Student > Master | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 43% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
Engineering | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,036
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Cell health and cytoskeleton
#3
of 24 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,461
of 285,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell health and cytoskeleton
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 21 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them