| Title |
Hypoxia-ischemia and retinal ganglion cell damage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s3361 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charanjit Kaur, Wallace S Foulds, Eng-Ang Ling |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 18% |
| Researcher | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 16% |
| Unknown | 42 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 10% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2021.
All research outputs
#5,446,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#491
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,297
of 97,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.