| Title |
Investigation of the association between the GLC3A locus and normal tension glaucoma in Japanese patients by microsatellite analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s4727 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
M Kamio, A Meguro, M Ota, N Nomura, K Kashiwagi, F Mabuchi, H Iijima, K Kawase, T Yamamoto, M Nakamura, A Negi, T Sagara, T Nishida, M Inatani, H Tanihara, M Aihara, M Araie, T Fukuchi, H Abe, T Higashide, K Sugiyama, T Kanamoto, Y Kiuchi, A Iwase, S Ohno, H Inoko, N Mizuki |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 6 | 46% |
| Researcher | 3 | 23% |
| Other | 2 | 15% |
| Unknown | 2 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 62% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2011.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#820
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,780
of 183,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.