↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Increased cesarean section rate in Central Saudi Arabia: a change in practice or different maternal characteristics

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
62 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Increased cesarean section rate in Central Saudi Arabia: a change in practice or different maternal characteristics
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s85215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hanan M Al-Kadri, Sultana A Al-Anazi, Hani M Tamim

Abstract

Cesarean section (CS) rate has shown an alarming increase. We aimed in this work to identify factors contributing to the increasing rate of CS in central Saudi Arabia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City. Two groups of women were included (G1 and G2). G1 had delivered by CS during the year 2002 (CS rate 12%), and G2 had delivered by CS during the year 2009 (CS rate 20%). We compared the included women's characteristics, neonates, CS indications, and complications. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 15 program. Odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated to report precision of categorical data results. A P-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant. A total of 198 women were included in G1 and 200 in G2. Both groups had comparable maternal and fetal characteristics; however, absence of antenatal care has resulted in 70% increase in CS deliveries for G2, P=0.008, OR =0.30, CI 0.12-0.76. Previous vaginal surgeries have contributed to tenfold increase in CS deliveries for G2, P=0.006, OR =10.37, CI 1.32-81.78. G2 had eight times increased CS deliveries than G1 due to intrauterine growth restriction, P=0.02, OR =8.21, CI 1.02-66.25, and 80% increased risk of CS was based on maternal demand, P=0.02, OR =0.20, CI 0.02-1.71. Decision taken by less-experienced staff was associated with 2.5-fold increase in CS deliveries for G2, P=0.002, OR =2.62, CI 1.39-4.93. There was a significant increase in CS deliveries under regional analgesia and shorter duration of hospital stay for G2, P=0.0001 and P=0.001, respectively. G2 women had 2.75-fold increase in neonatal intensive care unit admission, P=0.03, OR =2.75, CI 1.06-7.15. CS delivery rate significantly increased within the studied population. The increased rate of CS may be related to a change in physician's practice rather than a change in maternal characteristics, and it appears to be reducible.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 15 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 20%
Mathematics 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2018.
All research outputs
#895,204
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#63
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,354
of 278,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.