↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Is there any association between hormonal contraceptives and cervical neoplasia in a poor Nigerian setting?

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Is there any association between hormonal contraceptives and cervical neoplasia in a poor Nigerian setting?
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s86472
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard Ogbonna Ajah, Chibuike Ogwuegbu Chigbu, Benjamin Chukwuma Ozumba, Theophilus Chimezie Oguanuo, Paul Olisaemeka Ezeonu

Abstract

The association between hormonal contraception and cervical cancer is controversial. These controversies may hamper the uptake of hormonal contraceptives. To determine the association between hormonal contraceptives and cervical neoplasia. This was a case-control study in which Pap-smear results of 156 participants on hormonal contraceptives were compared with those of 156 participants on no form of modern contraception. Modern contraception is defined as the use of such contraceptives as condoms, pills, injectables, intrauterine devices, implants, and female or male sterilization. Those found to have abnormal cervical smear cytology results were subjected further to colposcopy. Biopsy specimens for histology were collected from the participants with obvious cervical lesions or those with suspicious lesions on colposcopy. The results were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics at a 95% level of confidence. A total of 71 (45.5%), 60 (38.5%), and 25 (16.0%) of the participants on hormonal contraceptives were using oral contraceptives, injectable contraceptives, and implants, respectively. Cervical neoplasia was significantly more common among participants who were ≥35 years old (6% versus 1%, P<0.0001), rural dwellers (6% versus 3.5%, P<0.0001), unmarried (7.6% versus 3.5%, P<0.0001), unemployed (6.8% versus 3.5%, P<0.0001), less educated (6% versus 3.8%, P<0.0001), and had high parity (6.8% versus 3.6%, P<0.0001). There was no statistical significant difference in cervical neoplasia between the two groups of participants (7 [4.5%] versus 6 [3.8%], P=1.0). There was no association between hormonal contraceptives and cervical neoplasia in this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 2%
Unknown 58 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 22%
Researcher 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 16 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 20 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2015.
All research outputs
#20,284,384
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,969
of 2,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,638
of 263,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#56
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.