↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Special considerations for placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis for the patient with Peyronie's disease: techniques and patient preference

Overview of attention for article published in Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Special considerations for placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis for the patient with Peyronie's disease: techniques and patient preference
Published in
Medical Devices : Evidence and Research, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/mder.s57252
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew D Lyons, Culley C Carson, Robert M Coward

Abstract

Placement of an inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is the mainstay of surgical treatment for patients with Peyronie's disease (PD) and concomitant medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. Special considerations and adjunctive surgical techniques during the IPP procedure are often required for patients with PD to improve residual penile curvature, as well as postoperative penile length. The surgical outcomes and various adjunctive techniques are not significantly different from one another, and selection of the appropriate technique must be tailored to patient-specific factors including the extent of the deformity, the degree of penile shortening, and preoperative patient expectations. The aims of this review were to assess the current literature on published outcomes and surgical techniques involving IPP placement in the treatment of PD. Patient satisfaction and preferences are reported, along with the description and patient selection for surgical techniques that include manual penile modeling, management of refractory curvature with concurrent plication, and correction of severe residual curvature and penile shortening with tunica release and plaque incision and grafting. A thorough description of the available techniques and their associated outcomes may help guide surgeons to the most appropriate choice for their patients.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Other 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 38%
Engineering 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Neuroscience 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%