↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Gender differences and psychological factors associated with suicidal ideation among youth in Malaysia

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
Title
Gender differences and psychological factors associated with suicidal ideation among youth in Malaysia
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2017
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s125176
Pubmed ID
Authors

Norhayati Ibrahim, Noh Amit, Normah Che Din, Hui Chien Ong

Abstract

Suicide is a global phenomenon that has been showing an upward trend in recent years. It is the second leading cause of death among youth. Studies on suicidal ideation warrant greater attention, as it leads to suicide attempts and other health risk behaviors. Thus, the objective of this study was to compare gender differences in suicidal ideation and determine the predictors of suicidal ideation among youth. This cross-sectional study was carried out among 232 youths aged between 15 and 25 years from selected urban areas in Malaysia. The results showed that suicidal ideation was higher among male participants compared with female participants. Age was the predictor of suicidal ideation for males, while depression and loss of motivation, as components of hopelessness, were the predictors of suicidal ideation among females. Hence, it is important that professionals conduct early identification tests for suicidality among young people. This will facilitate the early detection of depression and hopelessness, which is important, in order to prevent suicidal behaviors or other problems before these occur.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 154 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 22%
Student > Master 24 16%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 4%
Lecturer 5 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 60 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 28 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 4%
Other 20 13%
Unknown 63 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,653,039
of 25,124,631 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#179
of 735 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,337
of 315,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,124,631 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 735 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.