↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Quantitative assessment of pre-miR-218 rs11134527 polymorphism and cancer risk in Chinese population

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Quantitative assessment of pre-miR-218 rs11134527 polymorphism and cancer risk in Chinese population
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s88480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongyu Zhao, Rui Wang

Abstract

Accumulated studies have evaluated the association of pre-miR-218 rs11134527 polymorphism with cancer risk in Chinese population. However, the results remain controversial. To derive a more precise and more comprehensive estimation of the relationship, six studies focused on Chinese population were included for the pooled analysis for pre-miR-218 rs11134527 polymorphism using odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Pre-miR-218 rs11134527 polymorphism was associated with cancer risk (G versus A, OR =0.93, 95% CI: 0.88-0.98; GG versus AG + AA, OR =0.88, 95% CI: 0.79-0.97; GG versus AA, OR =0.85, 95% CI: 0.76-0.96). In the stratified analysis by cancer type, the pre-miR-218 rs11134527 polymorphism was only associated with the risk of cervical cancer (G versus A, OR =0.90, 95% CI: 0.83-0.98; GG versus AG + AA, OR =0.80, 95% CI: 0.68-0.94; GG versus AA, OR =0.79, 95% CI: 0.66-0.94). These findings suggest that the pre-miR-218 rs11134527 genetic polymorphism may decrease the susceptibility to cervical cancer, which needs to be verified or linked with functional studies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 50%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2015.
All research outputs
#15,340,815
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,026
of 2,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,934
of 263,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#30
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,933 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.