↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Role of small colony variants in persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis lungs

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Drug Resistance, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
Title
Role of small colony variants in persistence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in cystic fibrosis lungs
Published in
Infection and Drug Resistance, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/idr.s68214
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacob G Malone

Abstract

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic pathogen that predominates during the later stages of cystic fibrosis (CF) lung infections. Over many years of chronic lung colonization, P. aeruginosa undergoes extensive adaptation to the lung environment, evolving both toward a persistent, low virulence state and simultaneously diversifying to produce a number of phenotypically distinct morphs. These lung-adapted P. aeruginosa strains include the small colony variants (SCVs), small, autoaggregative isolates that show enhanced biofilm formation, strong attachment to surfaces, and increased production of exopolysaccharides. Their appearance in the sputum of CF patients correlates with increased resistance to antibiotics, poor lung function, and prolonged persistence of infection, increasing their relevance as a subject for clinical investigation. The evolution of SCVs in the CF lung is associated with overproduction of the ubiquitous bacterial signaling molecule cyclic-di-GMP, with increased cyclic-di-GMP levels shown to be responsible for the SCV phenotype in a number of different CF lung isolates. Here, we review the current state of research in clinical P. aeruginosa SCVs. We will discuss the phenotypic characteristics underpinning the SCV morphotype, the clinical implications of lung colonization with SCVs, and the molecular basis and clinical evolution of the SCV phenotype in the CF lung environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 24%
Student > Master 24 16%
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Researcher 20 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 20 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 23%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 9%
Chemistry 7 5%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 24 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2015.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Drug Resistance
#492
of 2,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,067
of 277,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Drug Resistance
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.