| Title |
Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s87585 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rachel Anne Kornhaber, Loyola M McLean, Rodney J Baber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 94 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 17% |
| Unknown | 23 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 27% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 22% |
| Unknown | 25 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,639,074
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#677
of 4,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,948
of 279,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#11
of 125 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,165 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 125 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.