↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in lung cancer: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 128)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Targeting PD-1/PD-L1 in lung cancer: current perspectives
Published in
Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy, July 2015
DOI 10.2147/lctt.s55176
Pubmed ID
Authors

María González-Cao, Niki Karachaliou, Santiago Viteri, Daniela Morales-Espinosa, Cristina Teixidó, Jesús Sánchez Ruiz, Miquel Ángel Molina-Vila, Mariacarmela Santarpia, Rafael Rosell

Abstract

Increased understanding of tumor immunology has led to the development of effective immunotherapy treatments. One of the most important advances in this field has been due to pharmacological design of antibodies against immune checkpoint inhibitors. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies are currently in advanced phases of clinical development for several tumors, including lung cancer. Results from Phase I-III trials with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in non-small-cell lung cancer have demonstrated response rates of around 20% (range, 16%-50%). More importantly, responses are long-lasting (median duration of response, 18 months) and fast (50% of responses are detected at time of first tumor evaluation) with very low grade 3-4 toxicity (less than 5%). Recently, the anti-PD-1 antibody pembrolizumab received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakthrough therapy designation for treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer, supported by data from a Phase Ib trial. Another anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, has also been approved for lung cancer based on survival advantage demonstrated in recently released data from a Phase III trial in squamous cell lung cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 40%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 7%
Chemistry 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 16 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2021.
All research outputs
#6,825,682
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#28
of 128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,072
of 277,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lung Cancer: Targets and Therapy
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them