↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Sublingual sufentanil for postoperative pain relief: first clinical experiences

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Sublingual sufentanil for postoperative pain relief: first clinical experiences
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s160091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fleur Meijer, Petra Cornelissen, Corina Sie, Michel Wagemans, Anja Mars, Tiny Hobma, Marieke Niesters, Albert Dahan, J Seppe Koopman, Monique AH Steegers

Abstract

The sublingual sufentanil tablet system (SSTS) is a novel hand-held patient-controlled analgesia device developed for treatment of moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Here we present the first results of its clinical use. Adult patients undergoing major surgery in five hospitals in the Netherlands received the SSTS for postoperative pain relief as part of multimodal pain management that further included paracetamol and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID). The following variables were collected: postoperative pain scores using the 11-point numerical rating score (NRS) at rest, number of tablets used, occurrence of nausea, and patient satisfaction scores. We included 280 patients in the study; the majority underwent laparoscopic abdominal (49%) or orthopedic (knee replacement) surgery (34%). The median NRS was 3.5 (interquartile range 2.3-4.0) on the day of surgery, 3.3 (2.3-4.0) on the first postoperative day, and 2.8 (2.0-4.0) on the second postoperative day; pain scores did not differ between surgery types. Mean number of tablets used was 19 (range 0-86). Nausea occurred in 34% of patients, more often in women (45% vs 19%). Overall satisfaction was high in 73% of patients. Satisfaction was correlated with pain relief (p<0.001) and inversely correlated with occurrence of nausea (p=0.01). In this data set obtained under real-life conditions we show that the SSTS effectively managed postoperative pain in abdominal and orthopedic surgeries. Future studies should determine patient populations that benefit most from the SSTS, assess the added values versus intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and determine the pharmacoeconomics of the system.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Master 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Postgraduate 4 10%
Other 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 15%
Psychology 3 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,240,790
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#448
of 1,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,748
of 326,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#15
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,771 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.