↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Klotho, stem cells, and aging

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Klotho, stem cells, and aging
Published in
Clinical Interventions in Aging, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/cia.s84978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ao Bian, Javier A Neyra, Ming Zhan, Ming Chang Hu

Abstract

Aging is an inevitable and progressive biological process involving dysfunction and eventually destruction of every tissue and organ. This process is driven by a tightly regulated and complex interplay between genetic and acquired factors. Klotho is an antiaging gene encoding a single-pass transmembrane protein, klotho, which serves as an aging suppressor through a wide variety of mechanisms, such as antioxidation, antisenescence, antiautophagy, and modulation of many signaling pathways, including insulin-like growth factor and Wnt. Klotho deficiency activates Wnt expression and activity contributing to senescence and depletion of stem cells, which consequently triggers tissue atrophy and fibrosis. In contrast, the klotho protein was shown to suppress Wnt-signaling transduction, and inhibit cell senescence and preserve stem cells. A better understanding of the potential effects of klotho on stem cells could offer novel insights into the cellular and molecular mechanisms of klotho deficiency-related aging and disease. The klotho protein may be a promising therapeutic agent for aging and aging-related disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 118 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 14%
Researcher 13 11%
Student > Master 13 11%
Other 11 9%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 28 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Sports and Recreations 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 30 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,139,439
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#229
of 1,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,639
of 276,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#4
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,962 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.