↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Rare and very rare adverse effects of clozapine

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
Title
Rare and very rare adverse effects of clozapine
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s83989
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pasquale De Fazio, Raffaele Gaetano, Mariarita Caroleo, Gregorio Cerminara, Francesca Maida, Antonio Bruno, Maria Rosaria Muscatello, Maria Jose Jaén Moreno, Emilio Russo, Cristina Segura-García

Abstract

Clozapine (CLZ) is the drug of choice for the treatment of resistant schizophrenia; however, its suitable use is limited by the complex adverse effects' profile. The best-described adverse effects in the literature are represented by agranulocytosis, myocarditis, sedation, weight gain, hypotension, and drooling; nevertheless, there are other known adverse effects that psychiatrists should readily recognize and manage. This review covers the "rare" and "very rare" known adverse effects of CLZ, which have been accurately described in literature. An extensive search on the basis of predefined criteria was made using CLZ and its combination with adverse effects as keywords in electronic databases. Data show the association between the use of CLZ and uncommon adverse effects, including ischemic colitis, paralytic ileus, hematemesis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, priapism, urinary incontinence, pityriasis rosea, intertriginous erythema, pulmonary thromboembolism, pseudo-pheochromocytoma, periorbital edema, and parotitis, which are influenced by other variables including age, early diagnosis, and previous/current pharmacological therapies. Some of these adverse effects, although unpredictable, are often manageable if promptly recognized and treated. Others are serious and potentially life-threatening. However, an adequate knowledge of the drug, clinical vigilance, and rapid intervention can drastically reduce the morbidity and mortality related to CLZ treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 174 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 14%
Student > Master 23 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 12 7%
Other 39 22%
Unknown 44 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 62 35%
Neuroscience 12 7%
Psychology 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 51 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2021.
All research outputs
#6,561,838
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#820
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,453
of 276,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#18
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.