| Title |
Albumin/globulin ratio is negatively correlated with PD-1 and CD25 mRNA levels in breast cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
OncoTargets and therapy, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ott.s159481 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chao Liu, Wei Wang, Xiangying Meng, Bing Sun, Yang Cong, Jiannan Liu, Qian Wang, Guangxian Liu, Shikai Wu |
| Abstract |
Previous studies have demonstrated the prognostic value of globulin (GLB), albumin (ALB), the ALB/GLB ratio (AGR), body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin (Hb), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in breast cancer. The underlying mechanism has been investigated by examining the impact of nutritional parameters on T cells, natural killer cells, and dendritic cells, but little is known about their effect on checkpoint molecules. Here, we investigated the correlation of mRNA expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), cluster of differentiation 28 (CD28), cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and cluster of differentiation 25 (CD25) with AGR, ALB, GLB, total protein, pre-ALB, Hb, BMI, and PNI in the peripheral blood of breast cancer patients. One hundred and three patients and 21 age- and sex-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Quantitative real-time PCR was used to test relative mRNA expression. The results indicated that the mRNA levels of PD-1 and CD25 were 5.2- and 3.3-fold higher in patients with low AGR than in those with high AGR (P < 0.05). The mRNA levels of PD-1 were 3.5-fold higher in patients with high GLB than in those with low GLB (P < 0.05). In addition, breast cancer patients had higher expression levels of PD-1, CD28, CTLA-4, and CD25 mRNA in their peripheral blood compared with healthy volunteers (P < 0.05). These results suggest that AGR is negatively correlated with PD-1 and CD25 mRNA levels, while GLB is positively associated with PD-1 mRNA levels. Nutritional status in breast cancer patients may influence the PD-1 pathway and have implications for the optimization of cancer therapy. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Librarian | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2018.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#889
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,507
of 343,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#34
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,807 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.