↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Combining statistical techniques to predict postsurgical risk of 1-year mortality for patients with colon cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Combining statistical techniques to predict postsurgical risk of 1-year mortality for patients with colon cancer
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, March 2018
DOI 10.2147/clep.s146729
Pubmed ID
Authors

Inmaculada Arostegui, Nerea Gonzalez, Nerea Fernández-de-Larrea, Santiago Lázaro-Aramburu, Marisa Baré, Maximino Redondo, Cristina Sarasqueta, Susana Garcia-Gutierrez, José M Quintana

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies and a common cause of cancer-related mortality. The aim of this study was to develop and validate a clinical predictive model for 1-year mortality among patients with colon cancer who survive for at least 30 days after surgery. Patients diagnosed with colon cancer who had surgery for the first time and who survived 30 days after the surgery were selected prospectively. The outcome was mortality within 1 year. Random forest, genetic algorithms and classification and regression trees were combined in order to identify the variables and partition points that optimally classify patients by risk of mortality. The resulting decision tree was categorized into four risk categories. Split-sample and bootstrap validation were performed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02488161. A total of 1945 patients were enrolled in the study. The variables identified as the main predictors of 1-year mortality were presence of residual tumor, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System risk score, pathologic tumor staging, Charlson Comorbidity Index, intraoperative complications, adjuvant chemotherapy and recurrence of tumor. The model was internally validated; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.896 in the derivation sample and 0.835 in the validation sample. Risk categorization leads to AUC values of 0.875 and 0.832 in the derivation and validation samples, respectively. Optimal cut-off point of estimated risk had a sensitivity of 0.889 and a specificity of 0.758. The decision tree was a simple, interpretable, valid and accurate prediction rule of 1-year mortality among colon cancer patients who survived for at least 30 days after surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 19 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 22%
Psychology 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2018.
All research outputs
#20,522,137
of 23,090,520 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#669
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,983
of 331,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#16
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,090,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.