↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Increased urinary L-histidine in patients with asthma–COPD overlap: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Increased urinary L-histidine in patients with asthma–COPD overlap: a pilot study
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s163189
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jee Youn Oh, Young Seok Lee, Kyung Hoon Min, Gyu Young Hur, Sung Yong Lee, Kyung Ho Kang, Chin Kook Rhee, Seoung Ju Park, Adnan Khan, Jinhyuk Na, Youngja H Park, Jae Jeong Shim

Abstract

Asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) is heterogeneous in nature and requires a unified diagnostic approach. We investigated the urinary levels of l-histidine, a precursor of histamine related to inflammatory responses, as a new candidate biomarker for diagnosing this condition. We performed a prospective multicenter cohort study with retrospective analysis of 107 patients, who were divided into three groups: asthma, COPD, and ACO, according to the Spanish guidelines algorithm. Urinary l-histidine levels were measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. High-resolution metabolomic analysis, coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and followed by multivariate statistical analysis, was performed on urine samples to discriminate between the metabolic profiles of the groups. Urinary l-histidine levels were significantly higher in patients with ACO than in those with asthma or COPD, but the subgroups of ACO, classified according to disease origin, did not differ significantly. High urinary l-histidine level was a significant factor for the diagnosis of ACO even after adjusting for age, sex, and smoking amount. Among patients with airflow obstruction, the urinary l-histidine levels were elevated in patients with a documented history of asthma before the age of 40 years or bronchodilator responsiveness ≥400 mL; bronchodilator responsiveness ≥200 mL of forced expiratory volume in 1 second and exceeding baseline values by 12% on two or more visits; blood eosinophil count ≥300 cells·mm-3; and frequent exacerbations (P < 0.05). Urinary l-histidine could be a potential biomarker for ACO, regardless of the diversity of diagnostic definitions used.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 26%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2,404
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,103
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#70
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.