↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

A systematic literature review of the clinical and health economic burden of schizophrenia in privately insured patients in the United States

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
Title
A systematic literature review of the clinical and health economic burden of schizophrenia in privately insured patients in the United States
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s156308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wenjie Zhang, Tony B Amos, Stephen W Gutkin, Nicole Lodowski, Emma Giegerich, Kruti Joshi

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review on the burden of schizophrenia in privately insured US patients. A systematic literature review of English language peer-reviewed journal articles of observational studies published from 2006 to 2016 was conducted using EMBASE/MEDLINE databases. Abstracts covering substantial numbers of patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (i.e., N ≥ 100) were included for full-text review. Articles that did not clearly specify private insurance types were excluded. A total of 25 studies were reviewed; 10 included only privately insured patients; and 15 included a mix of different types of insurance. The review of the clinical burden of schizophrenia revealed the following: compared to patients with no mental disorders, those with schizophrenia had significantly increased odds of systemic disorders and both alcohol and substance abuse. Antipsychotic (AP) adherence was low, ranging from 31.5% to 68.7%. The medication possession ratio for AP adherence ranged from 0.22 to 0.73. The review of the health economic burden of schizophrenia revealed the following: patients with a recent (vs. chronic) diagnosis of schizophrenia had significantly higher frequencies of emergency department visits and hospitalizations and greater length of stay (LOS) and total annual per-capita costs. Mean all-cause hospitalizations and LOS decreased significantly after (vs. before) initiating long-acting injectable APs (LAIs). Patients also had significantly decreased mean all-cause, and schizophrenia-related, hospitalization costs after initiating LAIs. Total direct per-capita costs of care (but not pharmacy costs) for patients who were nonadherent to their oral APs within the first 90 days of their index event were significantly higher (vs. early adherent patients). Despite these potential benefits, only 0.25%-13.1% of patients were treated with LAIs across all studies. Privately insured US patients with schizophrenia experience a substantial clinical and health economic burden related to comorbidities, acute care needs, nonadherence, and polypharmacy and have relatively low use of LAIs. Further study is warranted to understand prescribing patterns and clinical policies related to this patient population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 30 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 14%
Psychology 10 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 37 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,994,699
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#181
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,471
of 343,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#6
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.