↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Phytochemicals modulate carcinogenic signaling pathways in breast and hormone-related cancers

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Phytochemicals modulate carcinogenic signaling pathways in breast and hormone-related cancers
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ott.s83597
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roxana Cojocneanu Petric, Cornelia Braicu, Lajos Raduly, Oana Zanoaga, Nicolae Dragos, Paloma Monroig, Dan Dumitrascu, Ioana Berindan-Neagoe

Abstract

Over the years, nutrition and environmental factors have been demonstrated to influence human health, specifically cancer. Owing to the fact that cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, efforts are being made to elucidate molecular mechanisms that trigger or delay carcinogenesis. Phytochemicals, in particular, have been shown to modulate oncogenic processes through their antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities and their ability to mimic the chemical structure and activity of hormones. These compounds can act not only by influencing oncogenic proteins, but also by modulating noncoding RNAs such as microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs. Although we are only beginning to understand the complete effects of many natural compounds, such as phytochemicals, researchers are motivated to combine these agents with traditional, chemo-based, or hormone-based therapies to fight against cancer. Since ongoing studies continue to prove effective, herein we exalt the importance of improving dietary choices as a chemo-preventive strategy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 16%
Student > Master 11 11%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Other 6 6%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 9%
Chemistry 3 3%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 30 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2015.
All research outputs
#17,302,400
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#1,149
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,276
of 276,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#39
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.