↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Neuropsychiatric assessments in patients with multiple sclerosis in early phases and with low disability

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Neuropsychiatric assessments in patients with multiple sclerosis in early phases and with low disability
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s163480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio L Schmidt, Michele Santos da Silva, Juliana J Schmidt, Ana Lucia Novais Carvalho, Claudia Cristina Ferreira Vasconcelos, Renata Alves Paes, Yolanda EM Boechat, Rafael Neder, Regina P Alvarenga

Abstract

In the early phases of multiple sclerosis (MS), patients exhibit slight neuropsychiatric deficits that can only be detected using reliable tools. The present investigation aimed to examine neuropsychological performance in 35 patients with incipient MS. For the MS group, the inclusion criteria included time of disease <3 years and low disability. The neuropsychological battery consisted of Rey Auditory Learning Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Hooper Visual Organization Test, and Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT). After correction for the educational level, no significant effect of MS on performance was found for all the tests except for the number of errors of the SDMT (NE-SDMT). Higher levels of education were associated with better performances in all tests, except for the NE-SDMT. MS patients made more errors than the controls. The effect on the NE-SDMT may reflect difficulties in the ability to inhibit inadequate responses. Patients may exhibit impulsive control disorders in incipient MS, independent of their educational level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Bachelor 6 21%
Researcher 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 6 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 18%
Neuroscience 4 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Computer Science 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2018.
All research outputs
#7,791,459
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#977
of 3,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,851
of 343,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#28
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,120 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.