↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Sevoflurane anaesthesia during pregnancy in mice induces hearing impairment in the offspring

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Sevoflurane anaesthesia during pregnancy in mice induces hearing impairment in the offspring
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s156040
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xia Shen, Yanan Xiao, Wen Li, Kaizheng Chen, Huiqian Yu

Abstract

Exposure to gamma-aminobutyric acid-mimetics and N-methyl-D-aspartate-receptor antagonists during pregnancy may lead to hearing loss and long-term behavioral abnormalities in the offspring. The purpose of this study was to explore the association between prenatal exposure to sevoflurane (SEV) anesthesia and hearing impairment in mice. On gestational day 15, pregnant Kunming mice were exposed for 2 hours to 2.5% SEV plus 100% oxygen (anesthesia group) or 100% oxygen alone (control group). During auditory brainstem response testing on P30, offspring of the anesthesia group mice exhibited higher hearing thresholds at 8, 16, 24, and 32 kHz; longer peak latency of wave II at all four frequencies; and longer interpeak latencies from waves II to V at 16, 24, and 32 kHz, compared to the control offspring. Caspase-3, iNOS, and COX-2 activation occurred in the fetal cochlea of the anesthesia group. Mitochondrial swelling was observed in the anesthesia group offspring at P1 and P15. Our results suggest that SEV exposure during pregnancy may cause detrimental effects on the developing auditory system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 5 28%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 22%
Chemistry 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Unspecified 1 6%
Neuroscience 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,105
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,357
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#32
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.