↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Risk factors for surgical site infection in a teaching hospital: a prospective study of 1,138 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
Title
Risk factors for surgical site infection in a teaching hospital: a prospective study of 1,138 patients
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s86153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keping Cheng, Jiawei Li, Qingfang Kong, Changxian Wang, Nanyuan Ye, Guohua Xia

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) in a teaching hospital. A prospective study was initiated to investigate risk factors for SSI at a university-affiliated tertiary care center from July 2013 to December 2014. The chi-square test for categorical variables was used to determine the significance of association, whereas the multivariate logistic regression model was used to examine independent risk factors for SSI. A total of 1,138 patients met the inclusion criteria, in whom 36 cases of infection occurred during the hospitalization period and two cases occurred after discharge. Univariate analysis showed that SSI was associated with the type of operation, wound classification, volume of blood loss, blood transfusion, American Society of Anesthesiology score before surgery, risk index, duration of surgery, diabetes, cancer, gastrointestinal catheter, urinary catheter, postoperative drainage, and preprocedural white blood cell count. Multivariate analysis identified six independent parameters correlating with the occurrence of SSI: diabetes (odds ratio [OR] 6.400; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.582-15.866; P=0.000); cancer (OR 2.427; 95% CI 1.028-5.732; P=0.043); preprocedural white blood cell count more than 10×10(9)/L (OR 6.988; CI 3.165-15.425; P=0.000); wound classification (clean contaminated [OR: 7.893; CI: 2.244-27.762; P=0.001]; contaminated [OR: 7.031; CI: 1.652-29.922; P=0.008]; dirty [OR: 48.778; CI: 5.418-439.164; P=0.001]); operative duration more than 120 minutes (OR 4.289; CI 1.773-10.378; P=0.001); and postoperative drainage (OR 3.957; CI 1.422-11.008; P=0.008). Our data suggest that all these risk factors could be regarded as potential indicators of SSI and that relevant preventive measures should be taken to reduce SSI and improve patient outcomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 158 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 12%
Student > Postgraduate 20 12%
Researcher 15 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 19 12%
Unknown 61 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 61 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,423,683
of 22,824,164 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,295
of 1,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,945
of 264,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#50
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,824,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,261 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.