↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Advances in cancer pain from bone metastasis

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Advances in cancer pain from bone metastasis
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s87568
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao-Cui Zhu, Jia-Li Zhang, Chen-Tao Ge, Yuan-Yang Yu, Pan Wang, Ti-Fei Yuan, Cai-Yun Fu

Abstract

With the technological advances in cancer diagnosis and treatment, the survival rates for patients with cancer are prolonged. The issue of figuring out how to improve the life quality of patients with cancer has become increasingly prominent. Pain, especially bone pain, is the most common symptom in malignancy patients, which seriously affects the life quality of patients with cancer. The research of cancer pain has a breakthrough due to the development of the animal models of cancer pain in recent years, such as the animal models of mouse femur, humerus, calcaneus, and rat tibia. The establishment of several kinds of animal models related to cancer pain provides a new platform in vivo to investigate the molecular mechanisms of cancer pain. In this review, we focus on the advances of cancer pain from bone metastasis, the mechanisms involved in cancer pain, and the drug treatment of cancer pain in the animal models.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Master 10 9%
Researcher 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 8 8%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 37 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 6%
Neuroscience 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 19 18%
Unknown 39 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2019.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#440
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,880
of 276,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#25
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.