↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Autophagy dysfunction upregulates beta-amyloid peptides via enhancing the activity of γ-secretase complex

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Autophagy dysfunction upregulates beta-amyloid peptides via enhancing the activity of γ-secretase complex
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s84755
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhiyou Cai, Yingjun Zhou, Zhou Liu, Zunyu Ke, Bin Zhao

Abstract

Numerous studies have shown that autophagy failure plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease, including increased expression of beta-amyloid (Aβ) protein and the dysfunction of Aβ clearance. To further evaluate the role of autophagy in Alzheimer's disease, the present study was implemented to investigate the effects of autophagy on α-secretase, β-secretase, or γ-secretase, and observe the effects of autophagy on autophagic clearance markers. These results showed that both autophagy inhibitor and inducer enhanced the activity of α-, β-, and γ-secretases, and Aβ production. Autophagy inhibitor may more activate γ-secretase and promote Aβ production and accumulation than its inducer. Both autophagy inhibitor and inducer had no influence on Aβ clearance. Hence, autophagy inhibitor may activate γ-secretase and promote Aβ production and accumulation, but has no influence on Aβ clearance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 24%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Master 4 12%
Lecturer 3 9%
Other 8 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 33%
Neuroscience 7 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 3 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#3,342,680
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#466
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,151
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#11
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.