↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Identification of risk factors for hepatitis B and C in Peshawar, Pakistan

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
Title
Identification of risk factors for hepatitis B and C in Peshawar, Pakistan
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), August 2015
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s67429
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Shafiq, Muhammad Nadeem, Zeeshan Sattar, Sohaib Mohammad Khan, Muhammad Faheem, Irfan Ahsan, Rabia Naheed, Tahir Mehmood Khattak, Shahzad Akbar, Muhammad Talha Khan, Muhammad Ilyas Khan, Muhammad Zubair Khan

Abstract

Hepatitis B and C need immediate worldwide attention as the infection rates are too high. More than 240 million people have chronic (long-term) liver infections. Every year, about 600,000 people die globally due to the acute or chronic consequences of hepatitis B and more than 350,000 people die from hepatitis C-related liver diseases. Our study was designed as a case-control, descriptive study. It was conducted through formal interviews by using structured questionnaires. A total of 100 cases were included, with four controls for each case. This study confirms household contact, history of dental work, history of surgery, sexual contact, and history of transfusion (blood and its components) as the main risk factors which are responsible for the increased prevalence of hepatitis. The important risk factors, responsible for the high prevalence of hepatitis B and C in our society are household contact, history of dental work, history of surgery, sexual contact, and history of transfusion (blood and its components). The odds ratio of probability for these risk factors are: 4.2 for household contact history, 4.1 for history of dental work, 3.9 for sexual contact, 2.7 for history of surgery, and 2.1 for history of transfusion. Associations of other predictor variables (diabetes status, education level, profession, contact sports, intravenous drug abuse, residence, immunosuppression, and skin tattoos) were not statistically significant.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#249
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#202,331
of 276,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.