↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Impact of smoking on efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
Title
Impact of smoking on efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a meta-analysis
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/ott.s156421
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bingjia Li, Xiaoyu Huang, Linlin Fu

Abstract

Smoking status is associated with the efficacy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. Latest clinical trials have depicted the difference in the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in smokers and nonsmokers. However, the lack of statistical power in these trials prevented a final conclusion. The authors postulated that the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors correlated with smoking status. Clinical trials evaluating PD-1 inhibitors versus chemotherapies in smokers and nonsmokers were included. The hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were used. A total of 1,981 patients from three Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors significantly prolonged the OS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.78) and PFS (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.67; P = 0.027) in smoking patients versus chemotherapy. However, among nonsmoking patients, no significant improved OS and PFS were observed compared with chemotherapy. PD-1 inhibitors were more efficacious in smoking NSCLC patients compared with chemotherapy. No better survival of nonsmoking patients was observed in the treatment of PD-1 inhibitors than chemotherapy. Difference in the efficacy of PD-1 treatment should be taken into consideration in the future guidelines and clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 53 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 20 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Unspecified 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2020.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#487
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,078
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#10
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.