↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Exercise assessments and trainings of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
490 Mendeley
Title
Exercise assessments and trainings of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a literature review
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s167098
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuqin Zeng, Fen Jiang, Yan Chen, Ping Chen, Shan Cai

Abstract

Skeletal muscle dysfunction leads to reduction in activity in patients with COPD. As an essential part of the management of COPD, pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) alleviates dyspnea and fatigue, improves exercise tolerance and health-related quality of life, and reduces hospital admissions and mortality for COPD patients. Exercise is the key component of PR, which is composed of exercise assessment and training therapy. To evaluate PR's application in clinical practice, this article summarizes the common methods of exercise measurement and exercise training for patients with COPD. Exercise assessments should calculate patients' symptoms, endurance, strength, and health-related quality of life. After calculation, detailed exercise therapies should be developed, which may involve endurance, strength, and respiratory training. The detailed exercise training of each modality is mentioned in this review. Although various methods and therapies of PR have been used in COPD patients, developing an individualized exercise training prescription is the target. More studies are warranted to support the evidence and examine the effects of long-term benefits of exercise training for patients with COPD in each stage.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 490 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 490 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 94 19%
Student > Master 39 8%
Other 22 4%
Student > Postgraduate 20 4%
Researcher 19 4%
Other 62 13%
Unknown 234 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 95 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 82 17%
Sports and Recreations 23 5%
Unspecified 11 2%
Engineering 7 1%
Other 29 6%
Unknown 243 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,757,283
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#748
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,131
of 342,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#23
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.