↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases in low-middle income countries: the view from Malawi

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
Title
The increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases in low-middle income countries: the view from Malawi
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, June 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s157987
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Gowshall, Simon D Taylor-Robinson

Abstract

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) are the leading cause of death globally, the majority of these being due to cardiovascular disease, cancer, chronic respiratory diseases, or diabetes. Mortality from many NCDs continues to increase worldwide, with a disproportionately larger impact in low-middle income countries (LMIs), where almost 75% of global deaths occur from these causes. As a low-income African country that consistently ranks amongst the world's poorest nations, Malawi as a case study demonstrates how transition due to societal change and increasing urbanization is often accompanied by a rise in the rate of NCDs. Other factors apart from changing lifestyle factors can explain at least some of this increase, such as the complex relationship between communicable and NCD and growing environmental, occupational, and cultural pressures. Malawi and other LMIs are struggling to manage the increasing challenge of NCDs, in addition to an already high communicable disease burden. However, health care policy implementation, specific health promotion campaigns, and further epidemiological research may be key to attenuating this impending health crisis, both in Malawi and elsewhere. This review aims to examine the effects of the major NCDs in Malawi to help inform future public health care policy in the region.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 485 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 76 16%
Student > Bachelor 56 12%
Student > Postgraduate 29 6%
Researcher 27 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 5%
Other 48 10%
Unknown 226 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 57 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 4%
Social Sciences 16 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Other 63 13%
Unknown 238 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,413,045
of 24,216,270 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#122
of 1,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,476
of 334,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,216,270 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,536 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.