↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Job strain: a cross-sectional survey of dementia care specialists and other staff in Swedish home care services

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Job strain: a cross-sectional survey of dementia care specialists and other staff in Swedish home care services
Published in
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, May 2018
DOI 10.2147/jmdh.s155467
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Sandberg, Lena Borell, David Edvardsson, Lena Rosenberg, Anne-Marie Boström

Abstract

An increasing number of older persons worldwide live at home with various functional limitations such as dementia. So, home care staff meet older persons with extensive, complex needs. The staff's well-being is crucial because it can affect the quality of their work, although literature on job strain among home care staff is limited. To describe perceived job strain among home care staff and to examine correlations between job strain, personal factors, and organizational factors. The study applied a cross-sectional survey design. Participants were dementia care specialists who work in home care (n=34) and other home care staff who are not specialized in dementia care (n=35). The Strain in Dementia Care Scale (SDCS) and Creative Climate Questionnaire instruments and demographic variables were used. Descriptive and inferential statistics (including regression modeling) were applied. The regional ethical review board approved the study. Home care staff perceived job strain - particularly because they could not provide what they perceived to be necessary care. Dementia care specialists ranked job strain higher (m=5.71) than other staff members (m=4.71; p=0.04). Job strain (for total score and for all five SDCS factors) correlated with being a dementia care specialist. Correlations also occurred between job strain for SDCS factor 2 (difficulties understanding and interpreting) and not having Swedish as first language and SDCS factor 5 (lack of recognition) and stagnated organizational climate. The study indicates that home care staff and particularly dementia care specialists perceived high job strain. Future studies are needed to confirm or reject findings from this study.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 21 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 12 21%
Psychology 4 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 26 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2018.
All research outputs
#13,386,867
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#364
of 848 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,354
of 326,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 848 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.