↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adherence to insulin treatment in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetic patients initiated on different insulin regimens

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
Title
Adherence to insulin treatment in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetic patients initiated on different insulin regimens
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, August 2015
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s87935
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dilek Gogas Yavuz, Sevim Ozcan, Oguzhan Deyneli

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate adherence to insulin treatment in terms of treatment persistence and daily adherence to insulin injections among insulin-naïve type 2 diabetic patients initiating insulin therapy with basal (long acting), basal-bolus, and premixed insulin regimens in a tertiary endocrinology outpatient clinic. A total of 433 (mean age of 55.5±13.0 years; 52.4% females) insulin-naïve type 2 diabetic patients initiated on insulin therapy were included in this questionnaire-based phone interview survey at the sixth month of therapy. Via the telephone interview questions, patients were required to provide information about persistence to insulin treatment, self-reported blood glucose values, and side effects; data on demographics and diabetes characteristics were obtained from medical records. Self-reported treatment withdrawal occurred in 20.1% patients, while 20.3% patients were nonadherent to daily insulin. Negative beliefs about insulin therapy (24.1%) and forgetting injections (40.9%) were the most common reasons for treatment withdrawal and dose skipping, respectively. Younger age (49.5±15.0 vs 56.4±12.0 years) (P=0.001) and shorter duration of diabetes (4.8±4.3 vs 8.8±6.3 years) (P=0.0008) and treatment duration (5.2±2.4 vs 10.7±2.4 months) (P=0.0001) were noted, respectively, in discontinuers vs continuers. Basal bolus was the most commonly prescribed insulin regimen (51.0%), while associated with higher likelihood of skipping a dose than regular use (61.3% vs. 46.0%, P=0.04). Persistence to insulin therapy was poorer than anticipated but appeared to be higher in patients with the basal bolus regimen. Negative perceptions about insulin therapy seemed to be the main cause for poor adherence in our cohort.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 13 25%
Unknown 16 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Other 12 23%
Unknown 18 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2015.
All research outputs
#19,841,389
of 25,257,066 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,307
of 1,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,632
of 270,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#42
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,257,066 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.